On Aug 11 15:14:29, m...@mansr.com wrote:
> Jan Stary <h...@stare.cz> writes:
>
> >> > -AC_OPTIONAL_FORMAT(oss, OSS, [AC_CHECK_HEADERS(sys/soundcard.h,,
> >> > - [AC_CHECK_HEADERS(machine/soundcard.h,
> >> > - [AC_CHECK_LIB(ossaudio, _oss_ioctl, OSS_LIBS="$OSS_LIBS
> >> > -lossaudio")],
> >> > - using_oss=no)])])
> >> > +AC_OPTIONAL_FORMAT(oss, OSS, [AC_CHECK_HEADERS(sys/soundcard.h,,
> >> > uing_oss=no)])
> >>
> >> Apparently, the presence of <sys/soundcard.h> is not
> >> a correct test of ossaudio being available in the system.
> >
> > Maybe I am confused by the Subject:
> > "remove check for machine/soundcard.h and libossaudio"
>
> The checks for those things have been removed. It now only checks for
> sys/soundcard.h since that better reflects what we actually want.
Does that mean "if sys/soundcard.h was found,
we are on a system where we want to use OSS"?
> > It seems this diff does not remove, but change the way
> > ossaudio is detected; namely, if sys/soundcard.h is present,
> > we have oss (which is wrong, at least on OpenBSD);
>
> Did you fix that typo (a git pull will do it)? If not, it would
> definitely "detect" it as present on any system.
With that typo fixed, ./configure on OpenBSD thinks that
OPTIONAL DEVICE DRIVERS
ao (Xiph)..................no
alsa (Linux)...............no
coreaudio (Mac OS X).......no
sndio (OpenBSD)............yes
oss........................no
pulseaudio.................no
sunaudio...................yes
waveaudio (MS-Windows).....no
and the compilatiopn fails as in my previous email.
But ./configure --without-sunaudio results in
OPTIONAL DEVICE DRIVERS
ao (Xiph)..................no
alsa (Linux)...............no
coreaudio (Mac OS X).......no
sndio (OpenBSD)............yes
oss........................no
pulseaudio.................no
sunaudio...................no
waveaudio (MS-Windows).....no
and it builds fine.
> > also, even with oss detected, we no longer set -libossaudio,
> > which also seems wrong (anywhere we want to use it).
>
> -lossaudio is _only_ for the emulation on *BSD. No library is required
> on systems with real OSS drivers. We shouldn't be using the emulation,
> so there is no need to link with the library either.
Right; sorry for the confusion.
Jan
_______________________________________________
SoX-devel mailing list
SoX-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel
