I was going to use SOX for various things but there was no development, so
I wound up porting everything I had done in SOX to Jack.  Now Jack is
somewhat dated too.  Seem like SOX may have a long way to go to catch up.
But keep up the good work.  It is nice to see it moving along again.

On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 12:41 PM Jan Stary <h...@stare.cz> wrote:

> On May 30 11:18:15, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> > On May 30 04:04:28, martinw...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On 5/30/24 00:03, Jan Stary wrote:
> > >
> > > > I very much doubt anyone uses libsox at all.
> >
> > > In fact, I was looking for something that uses libsox today,
> > > and the only Debian packages that depend on it are sox and sox-fmt-*
> (!)
> >
> > Exactly.
>
> No OpenBSD port uses libsox either.
>
> Not to be confused with libsoxr, despite the name:
> that's a separate library built in 2013 around the
> code that sox uses for [r]esampling. Ports use that.
> https://sourceforge.net/p/soxr/wiki/Home/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SoX-devel mailing list
> SoX-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel
>


-- 
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
_______________________________________________
SoX-devel mailing list
SoX-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel

Reply via email to