On Jun 06 12:10:42, [email protected] wrote:
> On 6/6/24 10:27, Jan Stary wrote:
> > Does anyone know why SoX tries to include <io.h>
> > The header file seems to be linux specific.
> > What is it supposed to provide?
> >
> > https://github.com/janstary/sox/issues/64
>
> Dunno. Can you tell from what code it inserts or doesn't according to
> whether it's set or not?
I can tell HAVE_IO is not set because I don't set it.
Which means <io.h> does not get included.
But then again, <io.h> does not even exist on any system I know of,
except Debian, which has sys/io.h (not sure if that's what's meant),
which contains nothing of relevance.
> Is it defined on Linux systems
Is what defined on Linux systems?
> and if you undefine it, does anything break?
If I completely remove all mentions of io.h, nothing changes
(at least on OpenBSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD, macOS, Debian or Solaris).
That's why I think it can go. But I wanted to ask,
in case someone knows what is it even supposed to do.
Jan
_______________________________________________
SoX-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel
