Thanks for all of your efforts. 

> On Sep 1, 2024, at 11:22 AM, Martin Guy <martinw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> # sox_ng: First release announcement
> 
> 
> I am happy (with some trepidation) to announce the first release of sox_ng,
> 
> a new project to unify the work in the 50 distros and the plethora of
> 
> development forks and branches and make six-monthly micro (bug fix)
> 
> and minor (new features) releases of SoX.
> 
> Its objectives are to:
> - facilitate package maintainers' work
> - reassure developers that they can work on SoX knowing that their work
>   can be released within predictable time
> - unify the current plethora of independent development efforts
> 
> - follow the style and vision of Chris Bagwell's SoXen
> 
> 
> The next releases are scheduled for 2024-10-18 (minor) and 2025-02-18 (micro).
> 
> ## sox_ng novelties
> 
> Differences between sox_ng and the hundred-odd different SoXen in the
> software distributions and the dozens of innovative forks are:
> - it fixes all the CVEs open against sox
> - it does regression tests against all the CVEs and some other bugs
> - it makes (almost) no compiler warnings
> - it compiles and the regression tests succeed on all the machines of the GCC 
> Compile Farm on
>   - amd64, arm-{32,64}, aarch64, chrp32be, mips64be, powerpc-64{le,be},
>     riscv-64, sun4v-64be, x86-{32,64}
>   - AIX, Almalinux, Alpine, Archlinux, CentOS, Debian, FreeBSD, MacOS X,
>     OpenBSD, OpenSUSE, Solaris, Ubuntu
> - its wiki is in the source tree
> - issues will live in the source tree
> - its copyright status has been sorted out. As a work, SoX is GPLv2 as is
>   the libsox library which had wrongly been declared LGPL
>   (src/opus.c is based on oggenc.c, which is GPLv2-only.)
>   Individual source files retain their more permissive licenses.
> - Distro-specific notes for package maintainers are in the wiki
> - It is fully usable from the command line except for
>   only being able to download the issues,
>   not push modifications or new issues yet. It will.
> - it has public accounting and accepts donations
>   but doesn't really have any expenses so, instead,
>   donations can be earmarked as bounties for
>   whoever resolves a particular issue satisfactorily.
> 
> ## Places
> 
> - The public sox_ng code repository, wiki and issues are visible on
>   codeberg.org/sox_ng/sox_ng with a hot backup on disroot.org/sox_ng/sox_ng
> - A mailing list: sox...@groups.io to post, sox-ng+subscr...@groups.io to 
> subscribe
> 
> ## Where to go next
> 
> If this is interesting, either fetch a tarball from
> 
> https://codeberg.org/sox_ng/sox_ng/releases
> or browse it on https://codeberg.org/sox_ng/sox_ng
> 
> README.md is a good place to start for an overview.
> 
> 
> ## Thanks
> 
> My heartfelt thanks go to:
> * the historical sox developers for so much good public work
> * the people who wrote the immense body of DSP code that SoX unites
> * codeberg.org support for prompt and courteous resolution
> * eneiev of the FSF for copyright insight
> * the GCC Compile Farm staff for creating such an incredible tool
> * the many people who have kept the candle of SoX development alight
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SoX-devel mailing list
> SoX-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel


_______________________________________________
SoX-devel mailing list
SoX-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel

Reply via email to