Julian Oliver wrote:

> there is nothing intrinsically 'viral' about the GPL - a term used to
> imply that GPL licensed code aggressively infects any code-base it comes
> into contact with - converting it indefinitely.

But that's exactly what it does do. If you link any GPL
code to your program, the whole program becomes GPL. If
that's not a kind of infection, I don't know what is.

It's true that a piece of GPL code won't come crashing
in through your network connection and infect your
code without your consent -- you have to choose to use
the GPL code in the first place. But I think most
people using the term "viral" w.r.t. the GPL understand
that (with the possible exception of Microsoft).

-- 
Greg

_______________________________________________
Soya-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/soya-user

Reply via email to