Oh cuz Randy responded....I distinctly remember it and will trry to find it 
when I get home tonight

At 04:00 AM 6/26/01 -0500, Randye J wrote:
>apparently both randy and i missed the post in which he did.  that's why
>all of the speculations been going on about whether he's on to matt.
>randye
>
>On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Pete B wrote:
>
> > Well Renaud did give the scanner back..
> >
> > But the murders need to be settled to totally get him out of the thought,,,
> >
> > At 03:16 PM 6/25/01 -0400, Chris Salmi wrote:
> > >The only sure fire way to eliminate the murder charge that is hanging over
> > >the head of Brennan is to close the murder case.  Now I can remember two
> > >cases, one is a very old one that probably no-one remembers, posted 
> about 2
> > >years ago.  The other one is the more recient one- involving the would be
> > >assassin, but there was no body therefore no murder.  If there was a 
> way to
> > >officially close that case, then everything would be fine.
> > >
> > >That said, I have no idea off the top of my head how to do that.  Now if
> > >there was some way to properly explain how and why the attack in the
> > >holodeck happened- we could very easily let Brennan off with a discipline
> > >and call it a day.  Short of a conclusion I do not see a way to safe the
> > >character.  A character that I would love to keep around for a bit longer.
> > >
> > >How about this.......  If the would be assassin could be somehow 
> identified
> > >and found dead (or killed in the attempt to arrest her), or at least 
> belived
> > >to be dead then the case disappears.   The thing that is really beating on
> > >Brennan is that he went into the holodeck after t'Llweiir and locked
> > >everyone out only to be found half dead with a Romulan medical 
> device.  Well
> > >if the would be assassin is believed to be dead then the case turns to 
> mudd,
> > >leaving  only the questions about the device and how/why he went in the
> > >holodeck and what happened inside.
> > >
> > >The device question has been taken care of- analysis shown it to be what
> > >Brennan said it was, a Romulan made Medical scanner.  While not 
> kosher, that
> > >alone will not get him in serious trouble.  How and why he got into the
> > >holodeck he coudl explain away- injuries wiped out the memories and he 
> could
> > >just refuse to answer.  That would get him in trouble, but how serious
> > >depends on Lasiter....  I mean if Lasiter can reasonablely believe 
> Matt then
> > >he will say somthing like, "while damaging it is certainly not damning
> > >enough to go to a full court martial, so an administrative discipline will
> > >appear on your record...."  Seriously, do we think that Lasiter will 
> let the
> > >man that holds his secret, and is doing him a huge favor by keeping him in
> > >command, just go down?  That would not be the Lasiter's style. The other
> > >question.. what happened inside the holodeck.  well since the only person
> > >that really knows is Matt Brennan as long as it is a good story they will
> > >have to go with it.  There case closed.  Maybe.....  Thoughts?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Chris
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Randye J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Cc: "chris salmi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "RJ Ferrance, DC, MD"
> > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Pete B" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Randye J"
> > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 02:23 PM
> > >Subject: Re: spd: ooc
> > >
> > >
> > > > i don't have any bright ideas, either.  it's just been a matter that's
> > > > hanging over matt's and (now) carrhae's heads without any suggestion of
> > > > resolution.  hey, renaud could just stop by the infirmary, hand the
> > > > scanner back to matt and close whatever caused him to take it in 
> the first
> > > > place.  randye
> > > >
> > > > btw, randy, chris has offered to give us a couple of days to role-play
> > > > their time in hawaii before he makes the next time jump.  wanna use 
> them?
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Does anyone have anything specific in mind?  After all, if Matt feels
> > >he's about to
> > > > > be charged with murder, he won't stick around to hope he gets 
> off.  He's
> > >not going
> > > > > to let his secret become un-secret, so he fears exposure, he'll
> > >evaporate.
> > > > >
> > > > > If you're looking for a way to get rid of him, you've got it :)
> > > > >
> > > > > If you want him to stay... we need to figure someting else out.
> > > > >
> > > > > rj
> > > > >
> > > > > ---- Original Message ----
> > > > >
> > > > > I do not have any troubles with that.  Since it is really Randy's 
> plot
> > >line
> > > > > Let's wait until he gets back from vacation to move forward with it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Chris
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Pete B" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > To: "Randye J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "chris salmi"
> > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "RJ Ferrance, DC, MD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Cc: "Randye J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 05:29 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: spd: ooc
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Well...not sure...chris?? Randy?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > At 04:43 PM 6/16/01 -0500, Randye J wrote:
> > > > > > >hi, guy.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >any thoughts on resolving the sword issue?  is it a possible
> > >storyline?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >randye
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=* 
> =-=*=-
> > > > > > >        .   |  *     Randye Jones
> > > > > > >          . |)  .    http://www.atouchofclassics.com
> > > > > > >       .   /|  .     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > >        . ( | )  .
> > > > > > >      .   . |  .     "Hate is not a family value."
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > -=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-
> > > >        .   |  *     Randye Jones
> > > >          . |)  .    http://www.atouchofclassics.com
> > > >       .   /|  .     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >        . ( | )  .
> > > >      .   . |  .     "Hate is not a family value."
> > > >
> > > >
> >
>
>-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-
>        .   |  *     Randye Jones
>          . |)  .    http://www.atouchofclassics.com
>       .   /|  .     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>        . ( | )  .
>      .   . |  .     "Hate is not a family value."

Reply via email to