On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Jason Dobies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm working on adding multiarch support to the SSM package > installation/removal pages. > > Brad mentioned how there's been talk about people not being happy with > the layout of these pages and suggested we get some input on it now. > > Depending on the extent of the changes, I may still end up doing a > direct perl to Java port, adding the arch support we need. But if I get > an idea now of the changes we want to see, I may be able to either > incorporate some of them now or at least lay some groundwork for working > them in later. > > Thoughts?
My biggest complaint about the SSM and SDC have been their separation and duplication. For instance, the SDC has pages to install/remove packages. The SSM has pages to install/ remove packages. Why not the SDC be a SSM page with a set of one. The only pages I've thought were relevant in the SDC were the ones that showed details of a specific system, but the 'control' pages could've been just SSM with one system it in. But with respect to the intsall / remove packages they look rather sane as is. jesus _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
