Slightly to my previous post about Spacewalk Proxy: the rhncfg* packages got installed from RHN Tools
============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Installing: spacewalk-proxy-installer noarch 0.4.4-1.el5 spacewalk 28 k Installing for dependencies: apr i386 1.2.7-11 rhel-i386-server-5 123 k apr-util i386 1.2.7-7.el5 rhel-i386-server-5 76 k httpd i386 2.2.3-11.el5_2.4 rhel-i386-server-5 1.1 M postgresql-libs i386 8.1.11-1.el5_1.1 rhel-i386-server-5 196 k rhncfg noarch 5.1.0-3.el5 rhn-tools-rhel-i386-server-5 51 k rhncfg-actions noarch 5.1.0-3.el5 rhn-tools-rhel-i386-server-5 27 k rhncfg-client noarch 5.1.0-3.el5 rhn-tools-rhel-i386-server-5 23 k rhncfg-management noarch 5.1.0-3.el5 rhn-tools-rhel-i386-server-5 33 k because their version (5.1.0-3) is greater than what is in the Spacewalk repo (0.3.1-1). Is that right? Is Spacewalk (Proxy, but I assume it might also affect clients) only supported for machines that are not subscribed to the RHN Tools channel? Shouldn't we bring the version of rhncfg* back? -- Jan Pazdziora Satellite Engineering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
