On 1/14/09, Jan Pazdziora <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:42:13AM -0500, Pradeep Kilambi wrote: >> Milan Zazrivec wrote: >>> Is there any reason why we don't pull osa-dispatcher & jabberpy with >>> spacewalk.rpm? (both packages are commented out in spacewalk.spec) >> >> osa-dispatcher is only needed if you wanna use osad from the clients. >> Since osad is not a default package, I don't see why osa-dispatcher >> should be installed by default with spacewalk. > > One reason is that if the client in fact installs osad and tries to > use Spacewalk, it won't work.
This comes as a surprise since I got osad->osa-dispatcher<->jabberd working nicely in my environment (0.3). I remember though that it was not an straight forward configuration. > > Another reason for having at least jabberd installed in default > spacewalk installation is bugzilla 479971 -- we create jabberd > configuration, and if would be nice to create it only after the > package was in fact installed, otherwise the files are owned by root > and jabberd won't be able to use them. Any chance of sharing the bugzilla number that states this issue with osad/osa-dispathcer/jabberd? Best regards, -- travellig. _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
