-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
Perhaps this is a silly question, but is there a particular reason that spacewalk is not developed with ODBC? (Using for example iODBC?) As I'm not a db-expert and hence not knowing about all the intricate details between different DBs I understand this might be the reason, but I'm curious. From my humble perspective moving to an "abstraction" of the underlying DB should surely be a good thing, instead of having to develop code for individual DBs and only specific code where necessary. I do apologise if this is a dumb question, but wouldn't mind someone explaining the reasons behind using a DB-specific code rather than abstraction. Kind regards, Christoffer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Charset: UTF8 Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify Version: Hush 3.0 wpwEAQECAAYFAklvFO0ACgkQoGiwk4tHXN0FEwP/aD3OYOX8u8VOSPkf5IQA7fthG6vK ImW7780Bmzkpstacvn2nGHNf0gY4J4eHjo6VqMyUrKSLvge4sVUkyUz68i1fvmjKjWo6 YTfoONDpAXWN/HEJB4Xlc/+8nB1u8/934JY06T1XVVJS2TYaTmXPrQ94/rN/GUI1ALsN A95hCzY= =E6EC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
