On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Brad Buckingham <[email protected]> wrote: > This is a good question. I'll be working on modifications in the future to > make the documentation links configurable. This would be to address the > fact that the various help links in Spacewalk are currently dead-links. > When I do that, it'll likely be controlled based on properties defined > rhn_docs.conf. If I follow by adding constants to Config.java, it'll likely > lead to adding 200+ additional constants (basically representing all of the > various links we currently have in the UI for help)... For this case, I'd > prefer not to duplicate the rhn_docs.conf properties in Config.java, but I > will if it is preferred by the majority.
The approach I've always taken was to do what feels natural, in most cases to me that was just using the string, cuz I hated the constants :) and to those that wanted to use the constants I let them. Since I saw more being added I figured I'd ask if it was being done because folks liked it or if it was being done simply because others were doing it. I sense this might end up being one of those vi vs emacs type of debates, so I'm fine with letting folks add them as constants if they *want* :) jesus _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
