This is a resend, something seems to have gone horribly wrong with the
previous attempt...
Hi,
The patch below reverses the order in which the Python rhncfg-client
script lists subscribed configuration channels for the current system.
The current commandline implementation lists the channels from the
lowest to highest rank, like this:
$ sudo rhncfg-client channels
Config channels:
Label Name
----- ----
lowest channel with lowest priority
low channel with low priority
high channel with high priority
highest channel with highest priority
The Satellite / Spacewalk web-based management interface lists the
channels the other way around. As the rhncfg-client script output has
no indication what the order is in which the channels are listed, and
because the order of the channels can be pretty important, I suggest a
small fix.
Which is patching /usr/share/rhn/config_client/rpc_cli_repository.py like this:
--- rpc_cli_repository.py.orig 2009-07-08 15:23:28.000000000 +0200
+++ rpc_cli_repository.py 2009-07-08 15:25:07.000000000 +0200
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
log_debug(4)
self.config_channels = self.rpc_call(
'config.client.list_config_channels', self.system_id)
+ self.config_channels.reverse()
return self.config_channels
def list_files(self):
This makes sure self.config_channels will be filled with the
subscribed configuration channels for the current system, in the order
that is consistent with the web-based interface.
Mind that I made this patch against the Satellite code I have at hand
here. I did check Spacewalk git master to see if the scripts look
different there and they do not, so the patch should apply fine. I do
*not* know, however, if Spacewalk returns the channels in the 'right'
order in the first place, contrary to Satellite.
Maxim Burgerhout
[email protected]
----------------
GPG Fingerprint
1CC2 A9B2 FE2E 799D 01DB 8A89 0AE8 B60A ACA3 4452
_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
