On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 05:33:51PM -0300, Devan Goodwin wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 03:53:14PM -0300, Devan Goodwin wrote:
> > >
> > > We've got both selinux build problems for Fedora 11, as well as
> > > selinux denials post install on at least el5. As such I've
> > > temporarily disabled
> >
> > What are the AVC denials on EL 5? I'm aware of the build problems
> >
>
> Now filed here:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513071
>
> Happened on CentOS 5.2.
As it turns out to be user error and not a bug in the code, could you
please revert the commit which commented out the Requires of *-selinux
packages, and just put in a check for 0%{?fedora} == 11, similar to
spacewalk-monitoring.spec?
That way we still have *-selinux packages installed and hopefully
tested on F10 and EL5. As Spacewalk 0.5 worked with SELinux in
Enforcing on those two OSes, we should try not to introduce
regressions, and keeping the modules in the transaction seems like the
best way to achieve that.
Thank you,
--
Jan Pazdziora
Senior Software Engineer, Satellite Engineering, Red Hat
_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
