ugh, I hate when we do that :) +1 to using the same one and repackage. In the short term, could we create one then symlink them to the other places? It would seem silly to create an rpm package that had just the one file.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Jan Pazdziora<[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > we seem to have three rhn_rpm.py files in the repository > > client/tools/rhnpush/rhn_rpm.py > backend/common/rhn_rpm.py > spacewalk/certs-tools/rhn_rpm.py > > plus one as > > satellite/install/rhn_rpm.py > > The contents are fairly similar thou not exactly the same. > > Wouldn't it make sense to refactor this thing to separate package and > have the other just Require / import that? > > -- > Jan Pazdziora > Senior Software Engineer, Satellite Engineering, Red Hat > > _______________________________________________ > Spacewalk-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel > _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
