On Monday 19 April 2010 02:44:36 am Miroslav Suchý wrote: > On 04/16/2010 05:16 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > Hey All, > > > > We should drop support for Fedora 11 and add Fedora 13. Fedora 11 will > > be EOL in ~2 months, > > -1, when it will eol in 2 months, why drop it now. > We will delete it when it will die, but why do it sooner? We have in the past, and it wont get support for most of the life of 1.0
> > to that end ive started building 0.9 for F-13 most of it is > > built. > > -1 > I do not like the fact that packages for F-13 will be built on some > not-yet-released packages. Unless we will distinguished it by some dist > tag, which will be overwriten by normal dist tag and we rebuild all > packages after release of F-13. F-13 is post Beta now. its feature complete, the only changes now should be bug fixes. again this is how we have done things in the past. > > I do not want to build our packages on top of rawhide or beta. If it > some packages are part of Fedora, then good. But most of our packages > are not there. Yet. > > > there are some supporting deps that need building. > > Do you mind to share with us? Which deps? jpam, oscache, redstone-xmlrpc, ehcache, and a few others > > I would like to make the switch to only build for EL-5 F-12 and F-13 > > but wante dto run it by everyone first. > > Commiting this changes 3 hours after sending this proposal is not > enough. IMO. I reverted this commit in master. > I leave fate of you commit in SPACEWALK-1.0 branch in hand of release > nanny and on the opinion of others. I find that to be unacceptable. Adding back F-11 would be ok but just reverting is downright rude. Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
