--
Tomas Lestach
RHN Satellite Engineering, Red Hat

----- "James Hogarth" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This is my first time trying to follow through the code and
> contribute
> to the codebase.
> 
> >From my perspective the ability via the XML-RPC API to get the last
> repo modified date (and possibly whether a build would be in
> progress)
> would be extremely useful to us.

Hello James,

I think this is wonderful idea! It might be helpful for more people.

> 
> The idea being that after an RPM is built via a build system and
> pushed via rhnpush there is not (as far as I know) a way via the API
> to check when the repodata actually gets updated.
> 
> As a result I have had a couple of times when a deploy of the new RPM
> for our application is meant to be carried out but the repodata
> hasn't
> quite been built yet resulting in wasted time and another RPM
> deployment later.
> 
> I'm thinking adding this to
> java/code/src/com/redhat/rhn/frontend/xmlrpc/channel/software/ChannelSoftwareHandler.java
> within the ChannelSoftwareHandler class *could* provide at least part
> of that info...
> 
>  /**
>     * Returns the last build date on the repodata for a channel
>     * @param sessionKey WebSession containing User information.
>     * @param id - id of channel wanted
>     * @throws NoSuchChannelException thrown if no channel is found.
>     * @return the build date on the repodata of the channel requested
>     */
> 
>    public String getChannelLastBuildById(String sessionKey, Integer
> id)
>         throws NoSuchChannelException {
>          User user = getLoggedInUser(sessionKey);
>          return 
> ChannelManager.getRepoLastBuild(lookupChannelById(user,id));
>    }
> 
> 

I've already applied your patch with one single change ...
(because getRepoLastBuild() may return null -> no repo will be generated for 
empty channels)

http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=spacewalk.git;a=commitdiff;h=6519f98fe579244ead774895b50f46c5a0d1f334

Thank you!

> I'm a sysadmin by trade and only dabble in code at this point....
> 
> Does it at least look like I'm on the right track for a proper patch
> to be submitted?

Yes, the patch looks very good.
Usually patches are sent as output of `git format-patch`. Otherwise no 
objections. :-)


Best Regards,
Tomas

> Incidentally whilst I'm looking at this code anyway.... I've noticed
> that ChannelDetail shows a 12 hour date for last repo build and last
> modified a 24 hour date.... any ideas?
> 
> James
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel

_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel

Reply via email to