right, log5j is really just a wrapper for log4j
On 07/09/10 11:21, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 07/09/2010 03:40 PM, Shannon Hughes wrote:
justin is working to get it approved into fedora but there was an
issue with the Source var in the spec file.
To be precise:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574575
IMO it is good spec, but since it is Justin first package he needs
sponsor. Only few people can sponsor others. One of them is Dennis
Gilmore, who promised to sponsor Justin, but according the BZ it seems
he did not response since April.
Dennis can you look at this review please?
> Shannon - do we still use/have log4j then?
Hmm log4j is not replacement for log4j, it is enhancement.
log5j requires log4j:
$ rpm -qpR /home/msuchy/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/log5j-1.2-1.el6.noarch.rpm
log4j
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
