On 03/07/2011 04:10 PM, Duncan Mac-Vicar P. wrote: > On 03/01/2011 02:31 PM, Jan Pazdziora wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 11:26:57AM +0100, Johannes Renner wrote: >> >>> > From ea324e8b7b6907f24d010b7b4439bc1e00e8f8bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Johannes Renner<jren...@suse.de> >>> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:20:52 +0100 >>> Subject: [PATCH] do not show delete link on creation of notes >>> (bnc#672090) >> >> One note here -- we really like the bugzillas to be public when >> they are referenced in the git commits. >> >> Is the bnc#672090 going to be flipped to public eventually? >> > > I think we need to define a policy here (for my team) on how to upstream > those bugs. After talking to Cliff I realized some bugs are also handled > internally (customers) at bugzilla.redhat.com, and they are copied.
Yes. True. > Should we do the same?: open a public bug in bugzilla.redhat.com product > "Spacewalk" copying the one from our internal bugzilla? Yes. That would be nice. Remove from you BZ report customer data or you internal data (hostnames, login...) and create BZ in bugzilla.redhat.com for product Spacewalk. > I can also find a way to make some bugs public, but then those would be > in Novell's bugzilla. If Novell's bugzilla is public, I think we can live with bnc#XXXXXXXX in commit subject. We also sometimes do not clone BZs if RHN Satellite bug is public. -- Miroslav Suchy Red Hat Satellite Engineering _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
