On 27.2.2012 20:08, R P Herrold wrote:
Checking the open bugs [1] I see only one that really seems relevant to
de-coupling the database from the Oracle backend to a more FOSS license
one (pgsql) [2]

Is there a tracking bug that is actually being worked, on this, which I
am missing?  this one has been re-targetted a couple of times and seems
not to be the one to look at

No, we are working on that without BZ. We are testing everything and when we encounter Pg error, we are going to fix it. If somebody report Pg error on nightly, it will help us. But alas this is not as usually as we wish.

I see also another piece of low hanging need in [3] 'Migrate SysV script
to support systemd at Fedora17' in an uncompleted status, but which has
a patch attached

-- Russ herrold

[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=Spacewalk%20Product%20all%20open

Named search have only local scope. No one but you can see it. :) I'm sure you wanted to post something like:
http://tinyurl.com/83gkv6e

[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521043

This should be fixed. Michael?

[3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767034

This is completly wrong (the patch) spacewalk-service is not service per se. It is just script meant for sysadmin if you want to restart/stop/start whole bunch of services which together make spacewalk server. But sys-v or system.d start each service using its own file. I'm sure Marcelo who is working on this BZ knows that, but this is definitely not blocker for release.


Mirek

_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel

Reply via email to