On Friday 02 of March 2012 18:13:29 Duncan Mac-Vicar P. wrote:
> On 03/02/2012 05:55 PM, Duncan Mac-Vicar P. wrote:
> > On 03/02/2012 04:06 PM, Tomas Lestach wrote:
> >> There's one more thing confusing for me, when we're in the errata
> >> area.
> >> I mean following two pages
> >> 
> >> https://<spacewalk>/rhn/errata/Overview.do
> >> https://<spacewalk>/rhn/errata/RelevantErrata.do
> >> 
> >> display the same errata content.
> >> We might want to drop one of them.
> > 
> > Ok, I have a patch that gets rid of errata/Overview.do. I need to
> > rebase for master.
> 
> attached.

Thank you!
Committed as: 86be01047a59b3f0120e30ce1af8fbaebc9b75cf

> 
> Is the removal of strings with this file as context needed?

That would be really nice, even if we usually do not remove the unused 
strings. :(

> 
> Duncan

Regards,
-- 
Tomas Lestach
RHN Satellite Engineering, Red Hat

_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel

Reply via email to