Milan Zázrivec wrote: % > Tomas and others, % > Any concerns? % > % > Thanks, % > Cliff % > -------- Original Message -------- % > Subject: [Bug 1033062] New: License of spacewalk-branding needs to be % > changed % > % > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033062 % > % > Description of problem: % > % > The license of the spacewalk-branding package needs to be changed since from % > now on the following css frameworks, fonts and icons will be included with % > the % > package: % > % > - Twitter Bootstrap (Apache-2.0) % > - Font Awesome (MIT and OFL-1.1) % > - Roboto Font (Apache-2.0) % > % > Given our own GPL-2.0 sources we would probably end up with an aggregate: % > % > "Apache-2.0 and GPL-2.0 and MIT and OFL-1.1" ... % % Is this report still valid? Does it need to be addressed?
I've moved all Twitter Bootstrap, Font Awesome and Roboto Font to separate packages so this is no more valid problem ;). I've updated bugzilla accordingly. -- Michael Mráka Satellite Engineering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
