> I've come across commit 8844fcb10460d7d9838e89e376e09e7b1539b3fe > which adds new tables for action chaining feature. > I noticed all table/trigger/constraint names have 'suse' prefix. > I guess I understand why you named it that way :). Anyway > majority of tables have rhn prefix but it isn't because they were > created by Red Hat engineers rather then just a legacy prefix from old days > when Satellite was born as Red Hat Network (and many years later opensourced > as > Spacewalk project). > > So we continue to use rhn prefix even if the project is called > differently nowadays because renaming of all tables is just not worth of it. > To sum it up - I'd like new tables to continue with old rhn prefix naming.
Hi Michael, first of all thanks a lot for reviewing that branch during development - that was exactly what I hoped for! It was my understanding that using the "suse" prefix was standard practice for schema parts that were contributed by us, as there are other tables with that prefix - evidently I was wrong. No problem though, I fixed those commits already. Thanks again, -- Silvio Moioli SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg Germany _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
