On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 11:30 -0600, John Hodrien wrote: > > > As an aside... if there was any interest in backporting this to > v0.6, I > > would be in favor of it. > > But then 0.7 is out RSN, so it'd seem like mostly wasted effort, no? > I might > be reading it wrong, but 0.7 sounds like a load of fix, and not a load > of > break.
Perhaps... but considering the seemingly trivial amount of work involved in updating the java package with this rather small update (since I was able to do it manually quite easily)... vs the amount of people that could be affected by this bug that won't/can't be early 0.7 adopters... I'd vote for a backporting... But... I'm not all that concerned either way... -- Andy Speagle "THE Student" - UCATS Wichita State University
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
