Anaconda is definately arch aware now for centos 5.4 at the least... I install firefox.x86_64 on our systems specifically to avoid getting firefox.i386 and the relevant 32bit libraries that come with it
2009/12/17 Colin Coe <[email protected]> > For RHEL5 this definitely works but is only required if, for example, > a package with the same name exists for both i386 and x86_64. I.e. > foo-1.1el5.x86_64 and foo-1.1el5.i386 > > For an internal packaging of the netbackup client, I used to include > acl.i386 in the list of packages in my kickstarts. > > CC > > On 12/16/09, John Hodrien <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > Not sure if it will work, but try tagging a ".i386" to the end of the > > package name. > > > > > > > I could be wrong, but anaconda used to be arch unaware. Hopefully I'm > wrong > > and this is fixed now. Packages otherwise could be specified like this > with > > an activation key, or installed with yum in a postscript. > > > > jh > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Spacewalk-list mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list > > > > > -- > RHCE#805007969328369 > > _______________________________________________ > Spacewalk-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
