[email protected] wrote: % Thanks Stephen.. % % Can anyone confirm that spacewalk still does store the packages via name-epoch-version-release instead of md5sum?
https://www.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/2008-September/msg00041.html The Spacewalk team is proud to announce the release of Spacewalk 0.2. ... * fully support multiple distributions within a single org: Red Hat Enterprice Linux, Fedora, CentOS % ________________________________________ % > I am having an issue where it seems packages from centos and rhel are % > getting intermingled. % > % > Packages from centos are being linked to rhel channels if they have the same % > name/version. % > The only difference is the checksum, which is how I thought it determined % > the difference between the packages. % > % > For example: % > CENTOS: openssh-clients-4.3p2-36.el5_4.4.x86_64.rpm (MD5: % > 323bcbc172aaa184be6a09b74fbbf2f8) % > RHEL: openssh-clients-4.3p2-36.el5_4.4.x86_64.rpm (MD5: % > 700204790cd941717e071ac5471a5fd2) % > % % I think this is a known problem from a while ago.. not sure what the % status of getting a fix is. The packages are chosen by % name-epoch-version-release versus md5sum or gpg signature. If anything works different than expected please file a bugzilla. Regards, -- Michael Mráka Satellite Engineering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
