I just wanted to follow up to my own email to say that the SRPMs are located under each version in the Fedora/12/ directory. ie: http://spacewalk.redhat.com/yum/0.7-client/Fedora/12/source/ While I can understand why it was done this way, it might make more sense to have the SRPMs provided at a different point in the directory structure such as: http://spacewalk.redhat.com/yum/0.7-client/source/<http://spacewalk.redhat.com/yum/0.7-client/Fedora/12/source/> <http://spacewalk.redhat.com/yum/0.7-client/Fedora/12/source/>
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 9:22 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]>wrote: > Any chance we will get to see the SRPM repo merged with the RPM repo? > > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Jan Pazdziora <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 08:07:32PM +0200, Jan Pazdziora wrote: >> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 01:44:40PM -0400, Wojtak, Greg wrote: >> > > Is there an ETA on getting the Spacewalk repo ( >> spacewalk.redhat.com/yum/0.8/...) repaired? I was hoping to do some >> client installs and it doesn't look like I kept any of the necessary rpm's >> locally anywhere. >> > >> > I am sorry, no ETA at the moment. >> > >> > The system serving the repos experienced hardware failure and our >> > guys are working to fix the problem; however, no exact expected time >> > of resolution of the 0.8 repos was given. >> >> Actually, it looks like the repos are back on-line. >> >> Please report any issues you might experience with them. >> >> Thank you for you patience, >> >> -- >> Jan Pazdziora | adelton at #satellite*, #brno >> Satellite Engineering, Red Hat >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Spacewalk-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >> > >
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
