On 21 May 2010 08:24, McLeod, Matt <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm running 0.8 on CentOS 5.4 with Oracle XE.  The database doesn't seem
> to have maxed out yet (it's at ~3.3GB) and I'm not getting anything that
> looks like an error message.
>
> Ever since the daily spacewalk-sync cron job updated the CentOS 5 base
> channels to 5.5 I've been seeing unexpected behavior with respect to
> package upgrades.  The SW web interface shows rather fewer than expected
> packages needing upgrade (~20 on most hosts) and "yum update" on the
> hosts show no packages needing upgrade.
>
> If I unsubscribe a client from all its channels then resubscribe the
> numbers look more reasonable -- 113 on the one I tested -- but "yum
> update" still doesn't think there's anything to upgrade.
>
> I've tried forcing the issue with yum ("yum clean all", "yum
> check-update") but it makes no difference.
>
> I've tried scheduling the updates via the web interface then doing a
> forced checkin ("rhn_check"), likewise no updates are applied.
>
> Finally, I've tried deleting the client from SW and then force
> re-registering.  Same result.
>
> I'm not sure where to go from here.  Does anyone have any suggestions?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Matt
>
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> The information contained in this communication is strictly confidential and 
> intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). The copyright in 
> this communication belongs to ITG Australia Ltd, ITG Hong Kong Limited, ITG 
> Singapore Pte Ltd and/or their related entities, including Investment 
> Technology Group, Inc., (collectively referred to as “ITG") and may contain 
> information that is private, confidential or subject to legal professional or 
> other privilege. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any 
> mis-transmission of this email.
>
> Access to this email by anyone other than the intended recipient is 
> unauthorized and further distribution of this email is strictly prohibited 
> without the permission of ITG. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
> email, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention or any action 
> taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be 
> unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you should not 
> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail and you should delete it and all 
> copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the 
> sender. ITG and/or its affiliates reserve the right to monitor and archive 
> all electronic communications through its/their network.
>
> The information contained in this email is believed to be accurate at the 
> time of publication. However, ITG disclaims all responsibility for any loss 
> or damage howsoever arising as a result of any person or entity acting upon 
> the information contained in this email and no liability will be accepted by 
> ITG for any such loss or damage. Any views expressed in this email are those 
> of the individual sender, except where the email states otherwise and the 
> sender is authorized to state them to be the views of ITG.
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>

What does it look like if you force a hardware refersh on the client
(either via the GUI or rhn-profile-sync on the client)?

James

_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

Reply via email to