If the errata are created before the 64-bit packages are downloaded, will the 32-bit packages be used instead? If I remove CESA-2010:0737 erratum from spacewalk, will centos-errata.py generate it again?
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Nutter Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 11:40 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] applying CESA-2010:0737 Important: freetype Update to x86_64 hosts doesn't work On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:29:54PM -0400, Yungwei Chen wrote: > I checked my CentOS 5 Update - x86_64 channel, and I do see both 32-bit and > 64-bit packages below. > So for some reason spacewalk shows 32-bit packages for 64-bit hosts in some > of the errata (CEBA-2010:0789, CESA-2010:0787, CEBA-2010:0764, etc). Besides > manually adding 64-bit packages to those errata, Is there a way to fix this > permanently? Thanks. > > freetype-2.2.1-28.el5_5.i386 CentOS 5 Update - x86_64 > freetype-2.2.1-28.el5_5.x86_64 CentOS 5 Update - x86_64 Most likely a bug in centos-errata.py then - it's not associating the correct packages with the errata when it creates it. I will try to take a look over the next week or so and fix the problem. Regards, -- David Nutter Tel: +44 (0)131 650 4888 BioSS, JCMB, King's Buildings, Mayfield Rd, EH9 3JZ. Scotland, UK Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland (BioSS) is formally part of The Scottish Crop Research Institute (SCRI), a registered Scottish charity No. SC006662 _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
