Ok, so that makes sense. So I can put the whole thing out there. Just tell them you can demo the entire Systems Management infrastructure using Fedora and if you want to use RHEL in a production environment then you replace Spacewalk with Satellite.
Thanks for the response. Aaron Prayther -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jan Pazdziora Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 11:01 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Feature comparison of Satellite vs. Spacewalk On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:34:43AM -0400, Aaron Prayther wrote: > I have a systems management infrastructure using Satellite, subversion, > puppet and OVAL for a customer and wanted to fully understand the > differences between Spacewalk and Satellite. I'm wondering if I can > reproduce my solution I have now in an environment that I can readily > have available on a public facing web site. Still being able to manage > RHEL entitled boxes. Note that getting content from Red Hat Network using satellite-sync is not supported on Spacewalk. -- Jan Pazdziora Principal Software Engineer, Satellite Engineering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
