Starting from 1.2 the version will match that of Spacewalk. That was the only reason for the big jump.
That being said, the Spacewalk API (existing functions) is stable, so there should not be any regressions. You should be able to use the latest spacecmd with Satellite. /aron On Nov 23, 2010, at 3:37 PM, Marco Shaw <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there a matrix that would outline the "most compatible" version of > spacecmd with each major RedHat Satellite version? > > I saw a RH Sat engineer recently state that Spacewalk 1.1 was the most > similar/compatible to the recent Satellite 5.4. > > Should one assume that spacecmd packaged with Spacewalk 1.1 would be > the wisest choice? > > http://koji.spacewalkproject.org/spacewalk/whole/spacewalk-5E/spacewalk-5E-1.1/x86_64/os/Packages/spacecmd-0.5.5-1.el5.noarch.rpm > > This appears to be the latest and greastest spacecmd RPM: > http://koji.spacewalkproject.org/spacewalk/whole/spacewalk-5E/spacewalk-5E-1.3/x86_64/os/Packages/spacecmd-1.3.1-1.el5.noarch.rpm > > Quite a jump in versions if that means anything... > > Marco > > _______________________________________________ > Spacewalk-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
