On Jul 12, 2011, at 6:39 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> ---- JDFire <[email protected]> wrote: 
>> On Jul 12, 2011, at 5:41 PM, Miroslav Suchy <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Dne 13.7.2011 00:12, [email protected] napsal(a):
>>>> Hello All,
>>>> 
>>>> I am currently running Spacewalk 1.4 and using spacewalk-repo-sync to 
>>>> upload packages from a local yum repository. During the upload process it 
>>>> seems that Spacewalk is adding a :1 to the filename that is displayed when 
>>>> you perform a search or view the package from within Spacewalk. Now the 
>>>> package on the local file system doesn't have this :1 added. Is there 
>>>> anything that could be causing this to happen?
>>> 
>>> It is epoch. If epoch is not set or zero. It should not be present.
>>> 
>>> Mirek
>>> 
>> 
>> Thank you Mirek for your quick answer. 
>> 
>> Just to make sure I understand. If the epoch is missing then the package 
>> gets a :1 added to the package name within Spacewalk? If this is the case. 
>> How would one fix this so that the package name is correctly setup within 
>> Spacewalk?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> JD
>> 
> 
> Correcting my above question. If epoch is present in the RPM is there anyway 
> to remove it from the name of the RPM within Spacewalk so that Spacewalk 
> search and the API would pick up the name of the package that is displayed as 
> the full name of the package?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

Any ideas as to how to get Spacewalk to not display the epoch number during 
searches?

_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

Reply via email to