On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Coy Hile wrote:
On 21/07/2011 19:04, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 06:23:36PM +0100, A Robinson wrote:
As a heads up -- I couldn't install spacewalk 1.5 on centos 6.0 as
it called for selinux-policy-3.7.19-93 and Centos contains
3.7.19-54.el6
Right. We kinda expect 6.1.
Will applying that RPM (built from the SRPM referenced earlier in the
thread) cause breakage to the rest of a 6.0 system?
Given the thoughtful original post, I'm assuming it won't. Don't blame the
spacewalk developers for not tracking CentOS (or SL...), I've already had to
update bits of CentOS 6 from the RHEL 6.1 SRPMS, it's just life.
jh
_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
