Franky Van Liedekerke wrote: % On Mon, 28 May 2012 14:13:04 +0000 % "Velayutham, Prakash" <[email protected]> wrote: % % > Hi, % > % > I just noticed that the update list for one of the clients (I am sure % > there are other clients with this issue too) is different when I % > check using "yum check-update" on the client compared to what the % > Spacewalk server shows. Is this expected? % > % > Spacewalk version - 1.6 % % I noticed it too, even with 1.7: it seems that "yum update" (or % check-update) also lists packages that will replace other packages, % while spacewalk just seems to update to the newest version of each of % the installed packages, plus dependancies.
Another reason for this behavior could be use of yum plugins which modify list of packages - e.g. priorities, protect-packages, protectbase, versionlock etc. Spacewalk has no idea what's filtered out locally on the client. Regards, -- Michael Mráka Satellite Engineering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
