On Tue, September 4, 2012 13:27, Matthew Patton wrote: > > It has been my experience that whenever something doesn't work and there > is no rational basis for it to fail, it's SELinux' fault. Unfair? >
It's never been my experience that SELinux is responsible for anything when it's set to disabled. I've seen the permissive mode swamp syslogd and/or auditd. _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
