I can readily imagine the converse; a single repository being a component
of many channels. But (potentially) different repos being part of the same
channel?
Or am I think about Channels all wrong? Should I just define say a
"centos6" channel and associate the 'base', 'update', 'extras', 'contrib',
'spacewalk client' repositories to it? I've never seen that in real life
or in an example. They've always been broken out into individual channels
and made into a hierarchy of channels.
--
Cloud Services Architect, Senior System Administrator
InfoRelay Online Systems (www.inforelay.com)
_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
