> I'm not sure if its Java that used too much memory or PostgreSQL, but > I can tell you I never run PostgreSQL on a server with only 2GB of ram > if i can avoid it. > there is probably some tuning that will be required to make it work > correctly also 1.7 has some known issues with leaving connections to > PostgreSQL running in transactions when it doesn't need them any more > and each one of those connections uses ram upgrading to 1.8 might > help. > > > Although 1.8 brought a lot of nice things it looks like there might be some connection/lock leak issues on postgres requiring a rhn-satellite restart every day (with osad) or every few days or som without it...
I can say though that 2GB seems awfully low for Spacewalk... I've never given an instance less than 4GB and preferably 6GB+ to allow the system to cache as much as possible etc - it really makes a huge difference in performance.
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
