Hi Simon,
see attahcech diff, which solved my problem. It's against SPACEWALK-1.7
branch.
Peter
On 1/21/13 5:59 PM, Mgr. Peter Hudec wrote:
Hi Simon,
yes, it did the upgeades ;)
I found the problem.
First, this is apt-get/aptitude fature, the python-apt api did not have
this strange behaviour.
Second where is the problem. The problem is with the wrong generated
Packages file. Exctly wit the information provided for the package.
Every package has control file, where is the package description. Thos
control file shuld be transported to the repository Packages file and
here is the problem.
In my case
Package pss-foxim fdo not have property "Installed-Size", but the
Packages does. If i remove the line form packages this packages goes ok.
Package strace have "Installed-Size: property, but the value differs
with the value in the Packages file. If i correct the value in the
Packages file, this package gos OK.
So generaly, the DebpackageWrites should follow thr package control file.
So the problem is in Pacakge writer java class and in the rhnpush and
it's XMLRPC API ;(
I hope I will be able to write quick fix for this problem.
best regards
Peter
On 1/21/13 4:44 PM, Simon Lukasik wrote:
On 01/21/2013 02:02 PM, Mgr. Peter Hudec wrote:
Dear all,
today I found a strange issue.
I out some packages into repository and installed then using spacewalk
server.
These packages were successfully installed, the spacewalk shows the
system is up2date and OK.
But when I run "apt-get upgrade -s" the system still wants to upgrade
the packages, even if they are the same version. Does anybody already
had this issue?
TEJB1139H5XEAS info # apt-get upgrade -s
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
pss-foxim strace worthless
3 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Inst pss-foxim [2.1] (2.1 spacewalk.fopss.sk [all])
Conf pss-foxim (2.1 spacewalk.fopss.sk [all])
Inst strace [4.5.20-2.3ubuntu1] (4.5.20-2.3ubuntu1 spacewalk.fopss.sk
[i386])
Inst worthless [1.0-2] (1.0-2 spacewalk.fopss.sk [all])
Conf strace (4.5.20-2.3ubuntu1 spacewalk.fopss.sk [i386])
Conf worthless (1.0-2 spacewalk.fopss.sk [all])
Does the `apt-get upgrade` (without the --simulate option) really
performs that actions?
And can you confirm that this issue persists even after `apt-get update`?
diff --git
a/java/code/src/com/redhat/rhn/taskomatic/task/repomd/DebPackageWriter.java
b/java/code/src/com/redhat/rhn/taskomatic/task/repomd/DebPacka
index e177eec..ce73a4a 100644
--- a/java/code/src/com/redhat/rhn/taskomatic/task/repomd/DebPackageWriter.java
+++ b/java/code/src/com/redhat/rhn/taskomatic/task/repomd/DebPackageWriter.java
@@ -107,9 +107,12 @@ public class DebPackageWriter {
out.write(pkgDto.getVendor());
out.newLine();
- out.write("Installed-Size: ");
- out.write(pkgDto.getPackageSize().toString());
- out.newLine();
+ Long packagePayloadSize = pkgDto.getPayloadSize();
+ if (packagePayloadSize > 0 ) {
+ out.write("Installed-Size: ");
+ out.write(pkgDto.getPayloadSize().toString());
+ out.newLine();
+ }
// dependencies
addPackageDepData(out, providesIterator,
diff --git a/backend/common/rhn_deb.py b/backend/common/rhn_deb.py
index db2009a..570c795 100644
--- a/backend/common/rhn_deb.py
+++ b/backend/common/rhn_deb.py
@@ -57,7 +57,8 @@ class deb_Header:
for hdr_k, deb_k in [('requires', 'Depends'),
('provides', 'Provides'),
('conflicts', 'Conflicts'),
- ('obsoletes', 'Replaces')]:
+ ('obsoletes', 'Replaces'),
+ ('payload_size', 'Installed-Size')]:
if debcontrol.has_key(deb_k):
self.hdr[hdr_k] = debcontrol.get_as_string(deb_k)
for k in debcontrol.keys():_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
