Thanks for that. I think I'm going to give up on trying to get this working and, yeah, just deal with a bunch of SCP and SSH commands. Kind of a pain, but oh well.
Looks like the traceback I'm seeing is a known bug with running CentOS 4 systems against a PostgreSQL-backed Spacewalk system, mentioned at https://www.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/2011-July/msg00222.html Should I edit the SW Wiki and remove the mentions for CentOS 4, if it's unsupported (or at least suffering from a long-standing regression) at this point? On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Spacewalk User < [email protected]> wrote: > ** > > No. My el4 clients have rhncfg, rhncfg-actions, rhncfg-client, > rhncfg-management, rhnlib, and osad packages to enable use of the > Satellite. This is the commercial Red Hat Network Satellite Server > product, not spacewalk, per se. > > On 2013-06-03 15:07, Chris Swingler wrote: > > Do you (or anyone else on the list) have > the spacewalk-client-tools-0.0-1.noarch.rpm package quoted at > https://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk/wiki/RegisteringClients#CentOS4? It > seems like it's necessary in order to get them to accept config files. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Spacewalk-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
