Fair enough. Bugzilla updated.
Cheers Stuart On 21/11/2014 14:16, Stephen Herr wrote: > No, you could make that argument about every single bug ever filed > against Spacewalk. By "security related" I mean related to users being > able to escalate their privileges on Spacewalk server or unauthenticated > attackers gaining access to information they should not have. > > I've asked this question in the bug too, but do you know if the 2.2 > clients work correctly? If they do then this will likely never get fixed > in old versions of Spacewalk. > > -Stephen > > On 11/21/2014 06:41 AM, Stuart Green wrote: >> OK, I guess this is indirectly security related if the fix is to disable >> part of a security component? >> >> >> On 20/11/2014 19:40, Stephen Herr wrote: >>> On 11/14/2014 10:21 AM, Stuart Green wrote: >>>> Found a public bug report, not sure much attention 'medium' severity >>>> gets? >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161288 >>>> >>> >>> Generally Spacewalk bugs are not fixed until the next release, FYI >>> (unless it's security related). >>> >>> -Stephen >> >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
