Could you verify, that the system within spacewalk has the same id as the client (1000010314)?? Maybe this system has been forced with a re-registration and now you have 2 systems with the same name
Am 16.06.2015 4:59 nachm. schrieb Brian Musson <[email protected]>:
Robert, here is the output from the client:
# service osad status osad (pid 1842) is running... # rhn-actions-control --report deploy is enabled diff is enabled upload is enabled mtime_upload is enabled run is enabled # rhn_check -vvv D: opening db environment /var/lib/rpm cdb:mpool:joinenv D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Packages rdonly mode=0x0 D: locked db index /var/lib/rpm/Packages D: loading keyring from pubkeys in /var/lib/rpm/pubkeys/*.key D: couldn't find any keys in /var/lib/rpm/pubkeys/*.key D: loading keyring from rpmdb D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Name rdonly mode=0x0 D: added key gpg-pubkey-c105b9de-4e0fd3a3 to keyring D: added key gpg-pubkey-0608b895-4bd22942 to keyring D: added key gpg-pubkey-442df0f8-4783f24a to keyring D: added key gpg-pubkey-548c16bf-4c29a642 to keyring D: added key gpg-pubkey-217521f6-45e8a532 to keyring D: added key gpg-pubkey-863a853d-4f55f54d to keyring D: added key gpg-pubkey-1bb35891-54f75af8 to keyring D: Using legacy gpg-pubkey(s) from rpmdb D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Providename rdonly mode=0x0 D: do_call packages.checkNeedUpdate('rhnsd=1',){} D: opening db environment /var/lib/rpm cdb:mpool:joinenv D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Packages rdonly mode=0x0 D: loading keyring from pubkeys in /var/lib/rpm/pubkeys/*.key D: couldn't find any keys in /var/lib/rpm/pubkeys/*.key D: loading keyring from rpmdb D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Name rdonly mode=0x0 D: added key gpg-pubkey-c105b9de-4e0fd3a3 to keyring D: added key gpg-pubkey-0608b895-4bd22942 to keyring D: added key gpg-pubkey-442df0f8-4783f24a to keyring D: added key gpg-pubkey-548c16bf-4c29a642 to keyring D: added key gpg-pubkey-217521f6-45e8a532 to keyring D: added key gpg-pubkey-863a853d-4f55f54d to keyring D: added key gpg-pubkey-1bb35891-54f75af8 to keyring D: Using legacy gpg-pubkey(s) from rpmdb D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Providename rdonly mode=0x0 D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Providename D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Name D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Packages D: closed db environment /var/lib/rpm Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, presto, rhnplugin Config time: 0.038 D: login(forceUpdate=False) invoked D: readCachedLogin invoked D: Unable to read pickled loginInfo at: /var/spool/up2date/loginAuth.pkl logging into up2date server D: rpcServer: Calling XMLRPC up2date.login D: writeCachedLogin() invoked D: Wrote pickled loginInfo at 1434032930.09 with expiration of 1434036530.09 seconds. successfully retrieved authentication token from up2date server D: logininfo:{'X-RHN-Server-Id': 1000010314, 'X-RHN-Auth-Server-Time': '1434032926.38', 'X-RHN-Auth': '7RfB/XtV6EqZw8hGYqe+dFasQ+3q9QvfIzO+RrKIdd0=', 'X-RHN-Auth-Channels': [['centos6-base-x86_64', '20150611060001', '1', '1'], ['spacewalk-client-x86_64', '20150611061143', '0', '1'], ['epel6-x86_64', '20150611061143', '0', '1'], ['centos6-sysops-x86_64', '20150504165024', '0', '1'], ['centos6-updates-x86_64', '20150611060258', '0', '1']], 'X-RHN-Auth-User-Id': '', 'X-RHN-Auth-Expire-Offset': '3600.0'} D: rpcServer: Calling XMLRPC up2date.listChannels This system is receiving updates from RHN Classic or Red Hat Satellite. Setting up Package Sacks Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile pkgsack time: 0.065 rpmdb time: 0.000 Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile repo time: 0.000 D: local action status: (0, 'rpm database not modified since last update (or package list recently updated)', {}) D: rpcServer: Calling XMLRPC registration.welcome_message D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Providename D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Name D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Packages D: closed db environment /var/lib/rpmJust saw, that my answer did not get to the list...
Did you try to run rhn_check with -vv or run it through the debugger with "python -i -m pdb $(which rhn_check)"?
Robert
Am 15.06.2015 18:56 schrieb Brian Musson <[email protected]>:Hi I am trying to get to the bottom of this issue but I have hit a wall. Any hints would be greatly appreciated. The action gets scheduled but never gets picked up. From last week the jobs are still "Queued" and have not been picked up yet. I have a task to do this same patching to a larger pool of systems (almost 800) this week. Any direction or hints would be greatly appreciated.This action will be executed after 6/11/15 6:00:00 AM PDTThis action's status is: Queued.This action has not yet been picked up.BMOn Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Brian Musson <[email protected]> wrote:Sorry to double post, but i thought it may be useful to show the output of the spacewalk proxy's /var/log/rhn/rhn_proxy_broker.log at the time of the run.10.12.82.141 = clientspacewalk-proxy# tail -f /var/log/rhn/rhn_proxy_broker.log2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11778 10.12.82.41: proxy/apacheServer.__call__('New request, component proxy.broker',)2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11778 10.12.82.141: broker/rhnBroker.handler2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11778 10.12.82.141: proxy/rhnShared._serverCommo2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11778 10.12.82.141: broker/rhnBroker.__handleAction2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11778 10.12.82.141: proxy/rhnShared._clientCommo2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11778 10.12.82.141: proxy/rhnShared._forwardServer2Client2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11778 10.12.82.141: proxy/apacheHandler.handler('Leaving with status code 0',)2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11778 10.12.82.141: proxy/apacheHandler.cleanupHandler2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11781 192.168.1.208: proxy/apacheServer.__call__('New request, component proxy.broker',)2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11781 10.12.82.141: broker/rhnBroker.handler2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11781 10.12.82.141: proxy/rhnShared._serverCommo2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11781 10.12.82.141: broker/rhnBroker.__handleAction2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11781 10.12.82.141: proxy/rhnShared._clientCommo2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11781 10.12.82.141: proxy/rhnShared._forwardServer2Client2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11781 10.12.82.141: proxy/apacheHandler.handler('Leaving with status code 0',)2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11781 10.12.82.141: proxy/apacheHandler.cleanupHandler2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11777 10.12.72.56: proxy/apacheServer.__call__('New request, component proxy.broker',)2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11777 10.12.82.141: broker/rhnBroker.handler2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11777 10.12.82.141: proxy/rhnShared._serverCommo2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11777 10.12.82.141: broker/rhnBroker.__handleAction2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11777 10.12.82.141: proxy/rhnShared._clientCommo2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11777 10.12.82.141: proxy/rhnShared._forwardServer2Client2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11777 10.12.82.141: proxy/apacheHandler.handler('Leaving with status code 0',)2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11777 10.12.82.141: proxy/apacheHandler.cleanupHandler2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11784 10.12.72.41: proxy/apacheServer.__call__('New request, component proxy.broker',)2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11784 10.12.82.141: broker/rhnBroker.handler2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11784 10.12.82.141: proxy/rhnShared._serverCommo2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11784 10.12.82.141: broker/rhnBroker.__handleAction2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11784 10.12.82.141: proxy/rhnShared._clientCommo2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11784 10.12.82.141: proxy/rhnShared._forwardServer2Client2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11784 10.12.82.141: proxy/apacheHandler.handler('Leaving with status code 0',)2015/06/12 16:06:26 -04:00 11784 10.12.82.141: proxy/apacheHandler.cleanupHandlerBMOn Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Brian Musson <[email protected]> wrote:My server connects indirectly through a proxy due to network segmentation. Checked the proxy for that file but could not find it. I did a tail on the spacewalk master and saw lots of messages mentioning the proxy server that serves the clients in question:10.12.13.142 = our proxy1000010038 = client IDspacewalk-master# tail -f /var/log/rhn/rhn_server_xmlrpc.log | grep 10.12.13.1422015/06/12 12:34:14 -07:00 16704 10.12.13.142: xmlrpc/queue.get(1000010038, 2, 'checkins enabled')2015/06/12 12:34:15 -07:00 16718 10.12.13.142: xmlrpc/up2date.listChannels(1000010038,)2015/06/12 12:34:15 -07:00 16721 10.12.13.142: xmlrpc/registration.welcome_message('lang: None',)BMOn Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Jan Dobes <[email protected]> wrote:----- Original Message -----From: "Brian Musson" <[email protected]>To: [email protected]Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 8:43:47 PMSubject: [Spacewalk-list] Spacewalk 2.2: Clients are not picking up scheduled tasksI have about 3000 systems registered in spacewalk, but today we are focusingon applying package updates to 22 of them. Of the 22 systems scheduled tohave security errata applied to them, 20 successfully completed the updatewithout error. Unfortunately, there are two systems which have the taskqueued and have not picked it up yet.I have restarted osad, rhnsd, restarted jabberd on the spacewalk master andproxy through which these failed systems connect. Other clients which havesuccessfully updated go through this proxy server as well.When looking at the GUI, the client appears to be healthy.BMWhat will appear in '/var/log/rhn/rhn_server_xmlrpc.log' on the spacewalk server when you run rhn_check?--Jan DobesSatellite Engineering, Red Hat_______________________________________________Spacewalk-list mailing list[email protected]https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
