On 2016-02-18 20:19 +0000, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
Jan,

Thanks for sticking with this!

My apologies on getting the steps right.  This time I following them explicitly:

1. stopped osad
2. scheduled update
3. ran "rhn_chceck -vv"

[root@bluefield ~]# /usr/sbin/rhn_check -vv
D: check_action{'action': "<?xml 
version='1.0'?>\n<methodCall>\n<methodName>packages.update</methodName>\n<params>\n<param>\n<value><array><data>\n<value><array><data>\n<value><string>tzdata</string></value>\n<value><string>2016a</string></value>\n<value><string>1.el5</string></value>\n<value><string></string></value>\n<value><string>x86_64</string></value>\n</data></array></value>\n</data></array></value>\n</param>\n</params>\n</methodCall>\n",
 'version': 2, 'id': 2743}
updateLoginInfo() login info
D: login(forceUpdate=True) invoked
logging into up2date server
D: rpcServer: Calling XMLRPC up2date.login
D: writeCachedLogin() invoked
D: Wrote pickled loginInfo at 1455826274.2 with expiration of 1455829874.2 
seconds.
successfully retrieved authentication token from up2date server
D: logininfo:{'X-RHN-Server-Id': 1000010162, 'X-RHN-Auth-Server-Time': 
'1455826275.39', 'X-RHN-Auth': 'l75aqjtpQW2aRJdb/2JuyI6B2EMQpfIpHtL35tinznI=', 
'X-RHN-Auth-Channels': [['centos5-x86_64', '20150219163429', '1', '1'], 
['centos5-base-x86_64', '20160218040000', '0', '1'], ['centos5-updates-x86_64', 
'20160218070000', '0', '1'], ['epel5-x86_64', '20160218000000', '0', '1'], 
['puppet-el5-x86_64', '20160218100000', '0', '1'], ['rpmforge-el5-x86_64', 
'20160218020000', '0', '1'], ['spacewalk-client-el5-x86_64', '20160218110000', 
'0', '1']], 'X-RHN-Auth-User-Id': '', 'X-RHN-Auth-Expire-Offset': '3600.0'}
D: handle_action{'action': "<?xml 
version='1.0'?>\n<methodCall>\n<methodName>packages.update</methodName>\n<params>\n<param>\n<value><array><data>\n<value><array><data>\n<value><string>tzdata</string></value>\n<value><string>2016a</string></value>\n<value><string>1.el5</string></value>\n<value><string></string></value>\n<value><string>x86_64</string></value>\n</data></array></value>\n</data></array></value>\n</param>\n</params>\n</methodCall>\n",
 'version': 2, 'id': 2743}
D: handle_action actionid = 2743, version = 2
D: do_call packages.update([['tzdata', '2016a', '1.el5', '', 
'x86_64']],){'cache_only': None}
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, rhnplugin
D: rpcServer: Calling XMLRPC up2date.listChannels
This system is receiving updates from RHN Classic or Red Hat Satellite.
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: centos.mia.host-engine.com
* epel: mirror.steadfast.net
* extras: mirrors.seas.harvard.edu
* updates: mirror.cs.pitt.edu
Reducing Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux 5 - x86_64 to included packages 
only
Finished
Checking for new repos for mirrors
D: Called update[['tzdata', '2016a', '1.el5', '', 'x86_64']]
Current: D: Sending back response((6,), 'Fatal error in Python code occurred', 
{})
D: do_call packages.checkNeedUpdate('rhnsd=1',){}
D: local action status: (0, 'rpm database not modified since last update (or 
package list recently updated)', {})
D: rpcServer: Calling XMLRPC registration.welcome_message

Afterward, I saw this in the Event History of the node I was trying to update:

Summary: Package Install scheduled by admin
Details: This action will be executed after 2/18/16 3:11:00 PM EST
This action's status is: Failed.
The client picked up this action on 2/18/16 3:11 PM
The client completed this action on 2/18/16 3:11 PM
Client execution returned "Fatal error in Python code occurred [[6]]" (code -1)

Packages Scheduled:
tzdata-2016a-1.el5.x86_64

What the heck is going on here?

Dimitri

Hmm, OK, some traceback ocurred. Please could you send content of
/var/log/up2date from the client from around time you have ran the
rhn_check (Thu Feb 18 15:11:14 EST 2016(?)). There should be a
traceback showing what went wrong.

Regards,
Jan



--
Jan Hutar     Systems Management QA
[email protected]     Red Hat, Inc.

_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

Reply via email to