Do you have any links for the 2.0 documentation? My Google fu is poor this AM
cheers L. ------ The most dangerous phrase in the language is, "We've always done it this way." - Grace Hopper On 16 March 2016 at 06:45, Jan Hutař <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2016-03-11 13:16 +1100, Lachlan Musicman wrote: > >> Hola, >> Trying to unpick a hairy problem I'm doing a lot of reading. >> Running Spacewalk 2.4.x on Centos 7.2, I note that according to yum, I >> have cobbler 2.0.x installed. >> [root@emts-res-utils1 pxe]# yum list installed | grep cobbler >> cobbler-loaders.noarch 1.0.3-1.el7 >> @spacewalk >> cobbler2.noarch 2.0.11-52.el7 >> @spacewalk >> cobbler20.noarch 2.0.11-52.el7 >> @spacewalk >> > > This is because there were some bugs in upstream Cobbler, so Spacewalk > developers decided to fork it. Do not know if there was some progress > since then. > > According to the cobbler website 2.6.x is the latest, and 2.2 is EOL. >> My main issue is the documentation - how accurate is the current >> documentation wrt the older cobbler? >> > > I would use Cobbler 2.0 documentation. > > It might be good to open a bugzilla to include newer version of cobbler > if you need that. > > Regards, > Jan > > > > -- > Jan Hutar Systems Management QA > [email protected] Red Hat, Inc. > > _______________________________________________ > Spacewalk-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
