it may be that the upstream source has pruned its repo.
in that canes try to copy the channel instead.
here is an article on RedHat's site that describes a few options
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/42232
note the article is based on RHN Satellite 5 so some of the paths may
be different but spacewalk is the upstream code base for it so its
essentially correct.

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Daryl Rose <[email protected]> wrote:
> Avi,
>
>
> The steps that you provided work great, with one exception.  The original
> channel has over 3000 packages, while the new channel has only 752.  Why
> wouldn't the new channel get all 3000?
>
>
> I didn't know if there was some kind of conflict between the two channels,
> so I disconnected the old channel from the repo and ran a new sync.  The
> sync came back and said there wasn't anything new to sync.
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Daryl
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> on behalf of Avi Miller <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 1:50 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] How to fix typo in channel label?
>
> Hi,
>
> On 19 Jan 2017, at 2:13 am, Daryl Rose <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> If I blow away the current channel and recreate it, do I have to blow away
> the repository as well?  Can I keep the repo and just link them back up?
> How about the three systems that I currently have registered to the channel,
> do I have to re-register them?
>
>
> You don't have to blow away the repository and you'll find that syncing is
> (almost) a no-op on the initial run because the packages already exist
> locally. They'll just get added to the new channel.
>
> You do not need to re-register the systems either. Just switch them to the
> new channel (if it is a base channel) or remove the old and add the new
> channel (if it is a child).
>
> So, the simplest option is actually to add a new channel (with the right
> name) and assign the repo and run the sync and then switch the clients.
> You'll find it's both pretty quick and pretty low risk.
>
> Note that I would create the new channel and switch all the clients and make
> sure it all works before deleting the old channel. You can have multiple
> channels pointing to the same repo, so that's fine.
>
> Cheers,
> Avi
>
> --
> Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
> Avi Miller | Product Management Director | +61 (3) 8616 3496
> Oracle Linux and Virtualization
> 417 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004 Australia
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

Reply via email to