It's important to note that you may get different results between these two methods. Scheduling updates via the web interface will update packages to the versions specified in the Errata. Whereas the command line will update to the latest version available in the channel. I've had circumstances where this was a concern, and used the command yum update-minimal --security to ensure I'm installing the versions specified in the Errata. Just an FYI.
On Jun 19, 2017 9:50 AM, "Wilkinson, Matthew" < [email protected]> wrote: > You can absolutely still use yum and yum security. Spacewalk reads the > current state of the server so you can do it either way. > > > > --Matthew Wilkinson > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:spacewalk-list- > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Robin Beardsley > *Sent:* Monday, June 19, 2017 09:48 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [Spacewalk-list] question regarding yum > > > > [This is an external email. Be cautious with links, attachments and > responses.] > ------------------------------ > > Is is ok to still use yum –security update on the command line vs > scheduling updates through the web interface? > > Would there be any kind of conflict that might arise from doing so? > > > > Thanks > > _______________________________________________ > Spacewalk-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
