Hello!

I'm currently have a problem with erratas deployments. While I'm trying to
deploy an errata I get the following error:

*Details:*
This action will be executed after 4/9/18 12:16:00 PM GMT
This action's status is: Failed.
The client picked up this action on 4/9/18 8:23 AM
The client completed this action on 4/9/18 8:23 AM
Client execution returned "Failed: Packages failed to install properly:
Package libgudev1-0:219-30.el7_3.9.x86_64 is not available for
installation" (code 32)

Errata Affected:

   - RHBA-2017:1311 - systemd bug fix update





When I check the errata's packages I get this list:

 RHBA-2017:1311 - Bug Fix Advisory  - Packages

RHEL 6 OS (x86_64)
sha256:01a653b21762a7fe70639da531283bcf7df7e7261fd414ed4ee2766f84ec18e8
libgudev1-219-30.el7_3.9-i686
sha256:d36b44c7639c9ef352289a48c78e2b7b2c20ad16fa140154bdf6d152a6e702ab
libgudev1-219-30.el7_3.9-x86_64
sha256:890025aa0efd5996f298fe9ca9245d0039eace186764deb142f0b3b6dc7e3293
libgudev1-devel-219-30.el7_3.9-i686
sha256:4c0d644eb4eab019af4afc8f350cdafb340bafe43ada1e4e26c4c7e9652528ca
libgudev1-devel-219-30.el7_3.9-x86_64
sha256:9704dc2026c37a3fb48ef8aebebcec69727b7eca5eb7935eed13068f4ca9df58
systemd-219-30.el7_3.9-x86_64
sha256:f0cfd9f15a30a6bdd0d3918f583ed72a55550a5d6c83245781aee9acbc725498
systemd-devel-219-30.el7_3.9-i686
sha256:e53cef6019e84ab3a0dd88953807d153c138d3dcdf2b82b1ae142ad8af0311a9
systemd-devel-219-30.el7_3.9-x86_64
sha256:236477aaa7892d0cdc69309babf2a6c965e9a5c015a4c33a98efe6f97a9cb5c0
systemd-libs-219-30.el7_3.9-i686
sha256:63ecd208f49be14ce5114d889ad634ef5f30c5bc3f14c145431471f00230bee2
systemd-libs-219-30.el7_3.9-x86_64
sha256:9604832bc4cafb57b41cbf092c40dccdd5d8fa62389e77b5a9c6c8b48b16f857
systemd-python-219-30.el7_3.9-x86_64
sha256:5f640b78a329045b0795b4a3cff510af03d5ace91e80cb3dc3cf322019d3dce1
systemd-sysv-219-30.el7_3.9-x86_64

Comparing the packages I found that Spacewalk is trying to download
libgudev1-*0:*219-30.el7_3.9.x86_64 instead  libgudev1-219-30.el7_3.9-x86_64
I've been looking on rhn logs but I didn't find any log that could advice
me about where the "0:" is added to the packages name.
More weird is this problem only happens with only one repository.

Does anyone have any Idea about what it could be happening?

Thanks in advance

Best Regards.

Ezequiel Sozzi.
_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

Reply via email to