Hi! > kernel is naming the ethernet-devices differently I am using "biosdevname=0 net.ifnames=0" as default kernel parameters to have consistent naming.
It turned out, that I have to use the server-dvd instead of netinstall. The problem is solved. Thanks! - Kevin 2018-05-09 15:18 GMT+02:00 Andreas Dijkman <andreas.dijk...@cygnis.nl>: > My best guess would be that the device eth0 isn’t present. In newer > releases, the kernel is naming the ethernet-devices differently. If you are > running vmware, try ens192 or ens166 as device. But if you have only 1 > interface, don’t supply the device at all. > > Kind regards, > > Andreas Dijkman > > > On 9 May 2018, at 13:22, Kevin Olbrich <k...@sv01.de> wrote: > > The previous text was not displayed correctly: > network --device=eth0 --activate --onboot=on --bootproto=dhcp > > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/FUFMmfAFbl08Tq~vi1spIA > > > Mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards, > Kevin Olbrich. > > 2018-05-09 13:18 GMT+02:00 Kevin Olbrich <k...@sv01.de>: > >> Hi! >> >> I have set up a kickstart profile for fedora 28 (first kickstart project). >> My kickstart file contains: >> *network --device=eth0 --activate --onboot=on --bootproto=dhcp* >> >> Every time I try deploying the image profile, I get: >> Source http://xxx... needs network for installation. >> (/tmp/anaconda.log) >> >> Both "installation source" and "software selection" are marked by >> exclamation marks. >> Network configuration is ticked and "wired eth0 connected". >> >> Any ideas? >> >> Kind regards >> Kevin >> > > _______________________________________________ > Spacewalk-list mailing list > Spacewalk-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list > > > > _______________________________________________ > Spacewalk-list mailing list > Spacewalk-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list Spacewalk-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list