Am 26. September 2018 18:01:16 MESZ schrieb "Randall R. Sargent" <rrsarg...@pilotcat.com>: >Thanks Robert. > >I applied the patch for rhnRepository.py and verified the client >version is up to date using the criteria gave (spacewalk.list). I did >follow Phil's blog and have been able to create Release & Release.gpg >files. I did not do any of the patching he mentioned though because I'm >assuming my versions are updated since he wrote the post. > >Attempting to patch after that gives me the same error. > >Next I am trying to run your add-multiarch-header script but am getting >the following error: > >/etc/rhn/spacewalk-add-debian-multiarch-header.py >/var/cache/rhn/repodata/xenial-main/Packages /tmp/xenial-main >Error: Inputfile '/tmp/xenial-main' not available. > >Am I just running your modified script, or do I need to run >spacewalk-debian-sync.pl before?
Of course you must sync the repos with the modified sync script (as stated). This extracts the Multi-Arch headers from the original Ubuntu / Debian repos and writes them to temporary files within /tmp. Robert > >Thanks again. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Robert Paschedag <robert.pasche...@web.de> >Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 10:10 AM >To: Randall R. Sargent <rrsarg...@pilotcat.com> >Cc: spacewalk-list@redhat.com >Subject: Aw: RE: [Spacewalk-list] Ubuntu/Deb Support > > > >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. September 2018 um 15:16 Uhr >> Von: "Randall R. Sargent" <rrsarg...@pilotcat.com> >> An: "Robert Paschedag" <robert.pasche...@web.de>, >> "spacewalk-list@redhat.com" <spacewalk-list@redhat.com>, >> "spacewalk-list@redhat.com" <spacewalk-list@redhat.com> >> Betreff: RE: [Spacewalk-list] Ubuntu/Deb Support >> >> I'm having no luck getting my xenial clients to recognize the Release >& Release.gpg files in my repos. I resorted to modifying the >pre-invoke.py script to write [trusted=yes] for each line in >spacewalk.list, now I'm no longer getting complaints about missing >Release files when I do an apt update. I am still unable to upgrade any >packages though: >> >> # rhn_check -vvvv >> D: check_action{'action': "<?xml >> >version='1.0'?>\n<methodCall>\n<methodName>packages.update</methodName >> >>\n<params>\n<param>\n<value><array><data>\n<value><array><data>\n<val >> >ue><string>bind9-host</string></value>\n<value><string>9.10.3.dfsg.P4< >> >/string></value>\n<value><string>8ubuntu1.11</string></value>\n<value> >> ><string>1</string></value>\n<value><string>amd64-deb</string></value>\ >> >n</data></array></value>\n</data></array></value>\n</param>\n</params> >> \n</methodCall>\n", 'version': 2, 'id': 26} >> updateLoginInfo() login info >> D: login(forceUpdate=True) invoked >> logging into up2date server >> D: rpcServer: Calling XMLRPC up2date.login >> D: writeCachedLogin() invoked >> D: Wrote pickled loginInfo at 1537966985.67 with expiration of >1537970585.67 seconds. >> successfully retrieved authentication token from up2date server >> D: logininfo:{'X-RHN-Server-Id': 1000010000, >'X-RHN-Auth-Server-Time': >> '1537966985.69', 'X-RHN-Auth': >> '8okffYSJDt+fznMR/PhU4rZCo31NCg9sFe84Gx6oRVo=', >'X-RHN-Auth-Channels': >> [['xenial-main', '20180925171652', '1', '1'], ['xenial-security', >> '20180925175349', '0', '1'], ['xenial-updates', '20180925172643', >'0', >> '1']], 'X-RHN-Auth-User-Id': '', 'X-RHN-Auth-Expire-Offset': >'3600.0'} >> D: handle_action{'action': "<?xml >> >version='1.0'?>\n<methodCall>\n<methodName>packages.update</methodName >> >>\n<params>\n<param>\n<value><array><data>\n<value><array><data>\n<val >> >ue><string>bind9-host</string></value>\n<value><string>9.10.3.dfsg.P4< >> >/string></value>\n<value><string>8ubuntu1.11</string></value>\n<value> >> ><string>1</string></value>\n<value><string>amd64-deb</string></value>\ >> >n</data></array></value>\n</data></array></value>\n</param>\n</params> >> \n</methodCall>\n", 'version': 2, 'id': 26} >> D: handle_action actionid = 26, version = 2 >> D: do_call packages.update([['bind9-host', '9.10.3.dfsg.P4', >> '8ubuntu1.11', '1', 'amd64-deb']],){'cache_only': None} >> D: Called update[['bind9-host', '9.10.3.dfsg.P4', '8ubuntu1.11', '1', > >> 'amd64-deb']] >> Apt-Spacewalk: Updating sources.list > >Error starts here > >> D: Sending back response(1, 'update failed', {}) > >The python-apt module failes to verify the repos. > >You said, your are using SW 2.8. Release? If yes, you are missing a >patch to support "signed" debian repos. See PR >https://github.com/spacewalkproject/spacewalk/pull/636. This is the >part you need to patch on the server. > >You also need to patch the clients. If you installed the newest >packages (as stated within this thread), your clients should be ok. You >can check this within your /etc/apt/sources.list.d/spacewalk file. If >this file contains one line for each channel your client subscribes, >you are fine. > >Now you still need to create the "InRelease" or "Release.gpg" files. >@Phil has written in his blog years ago. See >http://www.devops-blog.net/spacewalk/gpg-signing-apt-repository-in-spacewalk > >You need to create these files for each repo, of course. > >But even if this all works, you might still hit another bug with newer >Ubuntu / Debian distros using newer APT version, which got some >"improvements". >The error you might hit is the missing "Multi-Arch" header missing >within the repo meta data for each channel. > >So.....what I currently do (on my SW 2.7) system is. > >- Use the "old" sync script from Steve Meier in a modified version. >(see my repo >https://github.com/rpasche/spacewalk-debian-sync/tree/add-multiarch-header) >- wait some minutes after the sync finshed to let SW recreate the >"packages.gz" for each channel (here, the "Multi-Arch" headers are >missing) >- now run my spacewalk-add-debian-multiarch-header script to add the >missing headers to the packages.gz for each Debian channel I synced >before. >- now sign the repos > >Now, if all went well, clients have been patched (apt-spacewalk), >server has been patched (rhnRepository.py - see PR 636), your clients >should work. > >Robert > >> D: do_call packages.checkNeedUpdate('rhnsd=1',){} >> D: Called refresh_list >> Updating package profile >> D: rpcServer: Calling XMLRPC registration.welcome_message >> D: rpcServer: Calling XMLRPC registration.update_packages >> D: local action status: (0, 'package list refreshed', {}) >> D: rpcServer: Calling XMLRPC registration.welcome_message >> >> Does anyone have any ideas? >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Robert Paschedag <robert.pasche...@web.de> >> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 2:28 PM >> To: spacewalk-list@redhat.com; Randall R. Sargent >> <rrsarg...@pilotcat.com>; spacewalk-list@redhat.com >> Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Ubuntu/Deb Support >> >> Am 24. September 2018 21:07:58 MESZ schrieb "Randall R. Sargent" ><rrsarg...@pilotcat.com>: >> >Thanks much for this. I’m not seeing any difference in the behavior >> >of my 16.04 clients. They are able to register, but doing a package >> >update fails (any package): >> > >> >[cid:image001.png@01D4540F.FE7E7510] >> > >> >> I'm pretty sure, you are not using signs repos. >> >> Newer "apt", especially the python "apt" module fails while checking >the signatures of the repo, thus the "update" fails. >> >> Note: it is the update ("apt-get update") within the call to install >the package that fails. >> >> I also had this error with Debian 9, because I did not yet "sign" my >repos and used "Allow unsigned = true" within apt.conf. >> >> But these settings seem to be ignored, hence, the "apt" python module >"requires" the repos to be signed. It took me a while to debug this. >> >> In case you "are" using signs repos, you should provide some more >info...e.g. "rhn_check -vvvv" while trying to install a package via SW. >> >> Robert >> >> >From: spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com >> ><spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com> On Behalf Of Neal Gompa >> >Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 12:49 PM >> >To: spacewalk-list@redhat.com >> >Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Ubuntu/Deb Support >> > >> >On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:59 AM Randall R. Sargent >> ><rrsarg...@pilotcat.com<mailto:rrsarg...@pilotcat.com>> wrote: >> >Hi all, >> > >> >*Newbie* to Spacewalk here. At the risk of beating a dead horse, has > >> >anyone been able to successfully manage Ubuntu clients on 2.8? We >> >have >> >14.04 & 16.04 clients and it would make my life so much easier if I >> >could get them to reliably work. I have been able to get 14.04 to >> >register, and even update (with minor issues), but not 16.x. >> >Documentation is spotty out there in Google-land. >> > >> >Any help is appreciated! >> > >> > >> >Hey, yeah, it's possible to successfully manage Ubuntu clients with >> >Spacewalk 2.8. >> > >> >A couple of months ago, my colleague and I fixed the clients to work > >> >in Spacewalk git master (upcoming Spacewalk 2.9), and we backported >> >this to the 2.8 clients. >> > >> >The sources are here: >> >>https://gitlab.com/datto/engineering/spacewalk-debian-client-packages >> > >> >We also built the packages and published them on OBS. You can use >> >them by doing the following: >> > >> ># If you have older clients from Debian/Ubuntu repos $ sudo apt >purge >> >apt-transport-spacewalk rhnsd $ sudo apt autoremove # Installing the > >> >new packages $ sudo bash -c 'echo "deb >> >>http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/systemsmanagement:/spacewalk: >> >/2.8:/debclients/xUbuntu_16.04/ /" > >> >/etc/apt/sources.list.d/spacewalk2.8-debclients.list' >> >$ sudo apt-key adv --fetch-keys >> >>http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/systemsmanagement:/spacewalk: >> >/2.8:/debclients/xUbuntu_16.04/Release.key >> >$ sudo apt-get update >> >$ sudo apt install rhn-client-tools rhn-check rhn-setup rhnsd >> >apt-transport-spacewalk rhncfg rhncfg-actions >> > >> >There are builds for xUbuntu 16.04 and 18.04, as well as Debian 8.0 >> >and 9.0. Just swap "xUbuntu_16.04" in the instructions above for >> >"xUbuntu_18.04" or "Debian_8.0" or "Debian_9.0". >> > >> >Future development of the clients are going into Spacewalk's next >> >release. >> > >> > >> > >> >-- >> >真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth! >> >> >> -- >> sent from my mobile device >> >> -- sent from my mobile device _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list Spacewalk-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list