On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 8:30 AM Andreas Dijkman <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, of course, that’s completely understandable and fine and I don’t think > and expect SuSE is taking over the Spacewalk replacement development. > CentOS/RHEL/OracleLinux support would be really nice though :-) But as a > (hopefully straight forward) replacement, Uyuni is not that great for a > non-SuSE-house. >
I guess this is where you and I differ! I would have expected that they would because it would benefit them to allow the community to be fully integrated. The breakage was because historically they didn't need to care about it (SUSE Manager was a Spacewalk fork), and now they *should*. But at least they care enough that they'll maintain it once I get it working. > With that taken in mind, we are looking into Pulp (https://pulpproject.org/), > which is part of the Foreman/Katello (Sattelite 6) project. We only use the > repository-part of Spacewalk, including the cloning of channels, and not the > million other features of Foreman/Katello. So Foreman/Katello is a bit > feature-heavy for our taste. And as we already are running Saltstack, the > Uyuni-server would be a great replacement for us. But as everything else > goes, you need to look forward and use what you can and is available. > Pulp 3 is very nice! I'm starting to use it for my repository-only needs, and I really like it. :) -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
