http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2170





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-01-05 07:12 -------
Note comments at bug #2892. I propose there that Bayes training not consider
material after the </HTML>, but from your example it looks like non-Bayes tests
should continue looking there.

If people insist on using HTML, at least it should be *valid* HTML. Maybe we
need a validator eval that returns a varying score based on how bad the HTML is.
(Does SA have any way for an eval rule to pass a computed weight to a score?)



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to