http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2912
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-12 22:52 ------- Subject: Re: AWL Tests Running in Random Order On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 09:33:14PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-08 20:38 ------- > Subject: Re: AWL Tests Running in Random Order > > On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:44:35PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Or, create a new config type for running after all the other checks: > > > > after SYMBOLIC_TEST_NAME eval:name_of_eval_method([arguments]) > > > > and do pretty much the same thing. > > I was thinking something like that too, but then figured that the AWL > would pretty much be the only thing in there. > Yeah, but then it would be there for something else in the future to use. Honestly I could go either way, I'm more interested in making sure bad data isn't getting into my AWL database. Perhaps a deferment to Dan would be in order since he did the original move to a more standard rule back in September. Michael ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
